Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc. v. Kinetic Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: Kinetic Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2009cv01360
Filed: March 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 19, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2015)
November 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER GRANTING NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL FOR KINETIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Rachel Repka and SNR Denton US LLP are permitted to withdraw as counsel for Kinetic Technologies. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 14, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2012)
March 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER REGARDING WITHDRAWAL OF JILL F. KOPEIKIN AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD. Jill F. Kopeikin is relieved as counsel of record for AATI. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 9, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2012)
January 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER REGRADING WITHDRAWAL OF ANDREW N. THOMASES AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD. Andrew N. Thomases is relieved as counsel of record for AATI. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 3, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2011)
February 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL AND CHANGE OF LEAD COUNSEL. The request of Kinetic Technologies, Inc. for withdrawal of attorney Yar R. Chaikovsky as counsel for Kinetic and the substitution of Jimmy M. Shin as its lead counsel is granted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 25, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2010)
December 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY PENDING INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION; VACATING PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DEADLINES AND DATES; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES. No later than one year from the date of this order, and every 365 days thereafter, the parties shall file a joint status report to apprise of the status of the reexamination proceeding. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 15, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2009)
November 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; VACATING DECEMBER 18, 2009 HEARING. The Court finds it appropriate to retain the current briefing schedule on the motion to stay, and to take the motion to stay under submission as of the date on which the reply is presently due, specifically, December 4, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 20, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2009)
August 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 58 AMENDED PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 8/14/2009. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2009)
August 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 56 PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 8/10/2009. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2009)
July 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT; VACATING HEARING. To the extent the motion seeks dismissal of the complaint for failure to allege infringement in the United States, and dismissal of AATI's claims of inducement and contributory infringement, the motion is granted. In all other respects, the motion is denied. No later than July 24, 2009, AATI may file a First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 8, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2009)
June 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER GRANTING AATI'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AATI'S OPPOSITION TO KINETIC'S MOTION TO DISMISS. The hearing on Kinetic's motion remains on July 10, 2009. No party shall, in the future, file a motion to change time without first engaging in a reasonable effort to meet and confer. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 30, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2009)
June 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/18/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2009)
June 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QUASH DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 16, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc. v. Kinetic Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew Neil Thomases
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kinetic Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Christian Emile Mammen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?