Mohsen v. Moss et al
| Amr Mohsen |
| Joel Moss, Christopher Forvour, David Carr, Anthony Montero, Danny Shum, Bruce Whitten, Steven Coffin, Craig Walker, Robin Harris, Kyle Waldinger, The City of Campbell and The Police Department of the City of Campbell |
| 3:2009cv01426 |
| April 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Charles R. Breyer |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 57 Motion for an Order to Preserve Documents.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2013)
|
|
Filing
56
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying without prejudice 55 Motion for an Order to Preserve Documents.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2013)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER Denying as Moot 37 MOTION to Quash filed by United States Patent and Trademark Office. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 01/03/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)
|
|
Filing
51
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 39 Motion for Leave for Court Order to Issue Subpoenas Duces Tecum. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2012)
|
|
Filing
41
NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND VACATING DISCOVERY HEARING. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/11/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
