Jankey et al v. Tufu Village et al
Les Jankey and Disability Rights, Enforcement, Education, Services: Helping You Help Others |
Tufu Village, NK Foods, Inc, George K. Shamieh and Kathryn Shamieh |
3:2009cv01449 |
April 2, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
American with Disabilities - Other Office |
Marin |
Maxine M. Chesney |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, that the agreed consideration has not been delivered over, the order of dismissal shall stand vacated and the cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 29, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2009) |
Filing 12 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 18, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2009) |
Filing 11 ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT NK FOODS, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Defendant NK Foods, Inc. is granted an extension of time to and including June 26, 2009 to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 11, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.