Gilbert v. Moneygram Payment System, Inc
Ryan M. Gilbert |
Moneygram Payment System, Inc |
3:2009cv01640 |
April 14, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Contract: Other Office |
Santa Clara |
Samuel Conti |
None |
Diversity |
28:1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 4/28/09. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gilbert v. Moneygram Payment System, Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ryan M. Gilbert | |
Represented By: | Kathryn Quetel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Moneygram Payment System, Inc | |
Represented By: | Michelle B. Heverly |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.