Kennedy Funding, Inc. v. Chapman et al
Kennedy Funding, Inc. |
Nicholas Chapman, JIREH Education Ministries, Newport Avalon Ministries, Douglas B. Allen and Burnett, Burnett & Allen |
3:2009cv01957 |
May 4, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Charles R. Breyer |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 163 ORDER TO DISMISS ENTIRE COMPLAINT INCLUDING ALL COUNTER CLAIMS AND CLOSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/3/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011) |
Filing 149 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING REQUEST FOR ALTERNATIVE RELIEF, AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 4/21/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/8/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2011) |
Filing 134 ORDER RE: 126 GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/1/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010) |
Filing 125 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COUNTER-CLAIMS OF NEWPORT AVALON INVESTORS, LLC. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/4/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2010) |
Filing 115 ORDER RE: 78 , 82 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANTS NICOLAS CHAPMAN, NEWPORT AVALON INVESTORS, LLC AND JIREH EDUCATIONAL MINISTRIES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 06/18/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2010) |
Filing 104 ORDER to continue CMC re 102 Stipulation, filed by Kennedy Funding, Inc., Motions terminated: 82 MOTION to Dismiss filed by JIREH Educational Ministries, Inc., 78 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Nicholas Chapman, Newport Avalon Investors, LLC. Case Management Conference set for 2/5/2010 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/6/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2010) |
Filing 101 ORDER to Continue Hearing re Motions to Dismiss and CMC due to tentative settlement re 99 Stipulation filed by Nicholas Chapman. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/16/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2009) |
Filing 91 ORDER continuing CMC re 89 Joint Case Management Statement filed by Kennedy Funding, Inc. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/23/2009 10:00 AM.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/22/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2009) |
Filing 88 ORDER granting deadline to respond to counterclaim re 85 Stipulation, filed by Kennedy Funding, Inc.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/1/609. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2009) |
Filing 77 ORDER to continue response date to second amended complaint re 73 Stipulation filed by Nicholas Chapman. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/28/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2009) |
Filing 56 ORDER DISMISSING Douglas B. Allen and Burnett, Burnett & Allen re 54 Stipulation filed by Douglas B. Allen, Burnett, Burnett & Allen,. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/16/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2009) |
Filing 45 ORDER regarding motions, second amended complaint, CMC and related deadlines re 43 Stipulation, filed by Kennedy Funding, Inc. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/2/2009 08:30 AM.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/2/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2009) |
Filing 25 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR TRO by Judge William Alsup [denying 10 Ex Parte Application]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.