City and County of San Francisco et al v. United States Postal Service et al
| City and County of San Francisco, Central City SRO Collaborative, San Francisco Tenants Union and Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco |
| United States Postal Service, John E. Potter and Michael Daley |
| 3:2009cv01964 |
| May 5, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
351
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/25/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)
|
|
Filing
350
ORDER re 252 MOTION to Compel PRIVILEGE LOG PLAINTIFF CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO PROMISED TO PRODUCE AND FOR LIMITED REOPENING OF DISCOVERY IF NECESSARY filed by United States Postal Service. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 10/17/2011. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2011)
|
|
Filing
246
ORDER REGARDING IN CAMERA REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 08/12/2011. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2011)
|
|
Filing
245
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 242 Joint filing concerning in camera review of documents on privilege log; Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 8/3/2011. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2011)
|
|
Filing
243
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 241 Stipulation filed by United States Postal Service. Motion Hearing reset for 8/23/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 08/03/2011. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2011)
|
|
Filing
231
STIPULATION AND ORDER re In Camera review of documents on privilege log; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 7/21/2011. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2011)
|
|
Filing
210
ORDER GRANTING Stipulation 209 re Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 6/30/2011. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2011)
|
|
Filing
201
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY, MODIFYING SCHEDULE. Pretrial Conference set for 12/15/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Jury Selection set for 1/9/2012 09:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 1/9/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/24/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2011)
|
|
Filing
188
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ACCELERATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A STAY. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/22/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2011)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR DISCOVERY MOTIONS RE: FACT DISCOVERY 159 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 6/13/2011. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2011)
|
|
Filing
158
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL FACT DISCOVERY re doc 152 Stipulation, filed by Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco, San Francisco Tenants Union, Central City SRO Collaborative, City and County of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 6/3/2011. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2011)
|
|
Filing
148
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY REQUIRED BY THE ALLEGATIONS IN THE COMPLAINT, re doc 147 filed by United States Postal Service. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 5/18/2011. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2011)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER RE: 122 PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR SHORTENED TIME. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/20/11. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2011)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER re 76 Letter filed by United States Postal Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on February 23, 2011. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2011)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 1/4/2011. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2011)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Discovery purpose. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/23/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2010)
|
|
Filing
49
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 48 PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/14/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2010)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER GRANTING 38 Stipulation LIFTING STAY OF DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/1/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2010)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING 34 Ex Parte Application for Leave to Permit Non-Lead Counsel to Appear at Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/5/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2010)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Granting 30 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on November 12, 2009. (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2009)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2009)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER APPROVING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Laporte on 10/13/09. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2009)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/3/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2009)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING 15 Stipulation selecting Mediation. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/4/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
