Lee v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan

Plaintiff: Pamela Lee
Defendant: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan
Case Number: 3:2009cv02176
Filed: May 18, 2009
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Joseph C. Spero
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 24, 2012 99 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 94 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER For Continuance of Briefing Dates and the Hearing Date for the Parties' Motions filed by Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan, Metropolita n Life Insurance Company, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 94 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER For Continuance of Briefing Dates and the Hearing Date for the Parties' Motions, 89 MOTION for Judgment on Partial Findings , 91 MOTION for Declaratory Judgment Notice of Motion and Motion for Entry of Judgment. Responses due by 1/23/2012. Replies due by 1/30/2012. Motion Hearing set for 2/13/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware.. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/24/12. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2012)
September 19, 2011 85 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT(SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2011)
October 12, 2010 57 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2010)
August 12, 2010 52 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re: briefing schedule; continuing hearing to 12/20/10 @ 9 a.m. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2010)
July 29, 2010 50 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND AMENDING JULY 14, 2010 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2010)
July 14, 2010 48 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL, DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE (Docket Nos. 40, 47) (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2010)
June 22, 2010 44 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER extending briefing schedule (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2010)
June 7, 2010 42 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER continuing motions to 9/17/10 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2010)
April 30, 2010 38 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER continuing motion hearing to 8/6/10 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2010)
February 1, 2010 35 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Docket No. 30] (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2010)
December 29, 2009 28 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY MOTION (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2009)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela Lee
Represented By: Laurence Fred Padway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?