Key Source International, Inc v. Apex Maritime Shipping Company et al
| Key Source International, Inc |
| Apex Maritime Shipping Company and Hartford Fire Insurance Company |
| 3:2009cv02389 |
| May 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 25, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2010)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING Show Cause Response due by 3/12/2010.. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 9, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2010)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER REOPENING CASE. MOTION TO STRIKE RESET FOR 3/25/2010 AT 8:00 A.M. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 2/23/2010. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2010)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 2/22/2010. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2010)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER: (1) GRANTING HARTFORD'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SEVENTH CLAIM WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AND (2) DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S EIGHTH, NINTH AND ELEVENTH CLAIMS by Judge William Alsup [granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
