AT&T Capital Services, Inc. et al v. T&W Industries, Inc. et al
AT&T Capital Services, Inc. and SBC Global Services, Inc. |
T&W Industries, Inc., Steven Tarpley and Kenneth Wilkens |
3:2009cv02591 |
June 11, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Maria-Elena James |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 41 Stipulation filed by AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Capital Services, Inc., T&W Industries, Inc., SBC Global Services, Inc.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/28/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2010) |
Filing 40 CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/6/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2010) |
Filing 37 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/18/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2010) |
Filing 32 STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 1/19/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2010) |
Filing 29 ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/6/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2009) |
Filing 26 ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 9/22/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.