Ching et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Arturo Ching and Ermina Navarro |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 3:2009cv02613 |
| June 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
CLERK'S JUDGMENT: With respect to plaintiffs remaining claims, defendants motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is hereby DENIED. Judgment entered in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company against Arturo Ching. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2010)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON PARTIES' CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The parties' stipulation to continue the hearing on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment from September 10, 2010 to September 17, 2010 is granted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 26, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2010)
|
|
Filing
56
STIPULATION ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ORDER THEREON. Defendant's motion shall be filed no later than June 25, 2010. Plaintiff's opposition and any cross-motion shall be filed no later than July 16, 2010. Defendant's reply and oppositi on to cross-motion shall be filed no later than August 6, 2010. Plaintiff's reply shall be filed no later than August 20, 2010. The hearing on the motions shall be conducted on September 10, 2010. The Further Case Management is continued from August 13, 2010 to October 29, 2010; a Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than October 22, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 25, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2010)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART STATE FARM'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AFFORDING LEAVE TO FILE SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 7, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2010)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE; GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY; CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 13, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2010)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBIT O TO DECLARATION OF MICHAEL V. STORTI; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 24, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2010)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 18, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2010)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 16, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2010)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Judge Laporte granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Compel (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2010)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND ALL FURTHER DISCOVERY MATTERS. The January 8, 2010 hearing date is vacated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 10, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
