Hernandez v. City of Napa et al
| Luz Hernandez |
| City of Napa, Richard Melton, Garth Bender, Ryan Cole, Ryan Hibbs, Donald Green and John Hallman |
| 3:2009cv02782 |
| June 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Napa |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
318
ORDER RE: JUROR PAY. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 6/14/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2012)
|
|
Filing
310
ORDER REGARDING PRE-TRIAL RULING ON NEGLIGENCE. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 6/8/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2012)
|
|
Filing
293
ORDER RE JUROR REFRESHMENTS. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 5/30/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2012)
|
|
Filing
183
ORDER re: Letter dated June 8, 2011 from Kevin Gilbert. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 6/15/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2011)
|
|
Filing
177
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE for a settlement conference. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 4/8/2011. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2011)
|
|
Filing
176
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE AND FILING DATE OF JOINT STATEMENT, re doc 175 Stipulation filed by Ryan Hibbs, Garth Bender, City of Napa. The trial setting conference is continued from 4/5/2011 to 5/3/2011 at 10:00AM. A joint statement is due 4/26/2011. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/31/2011. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2011)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting in part and denying in part re 131 City of Napa & Officer Bender's Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying County of Napa, Deputy Sheriff Hallman's Request for Summary Judgment of Conspiracy Claim; Denying re 159 Motion to Strike. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2011)
|
|
Filing
167
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DATE for Napa Defendants and Plaintiff's Expert Disclosure re 165 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 1/25/2011. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2011)
|
|
Filing
164
ORDER by Judge Laporte regarding 155 Motion to Shorten Time and Motion to Strike (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2011)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER REGARDING IN CAMERA REVIEW OF TWO CITY OF NAPA INTERNAL AFFAIRS FILES. Signed by Judge Laporte on 12/16/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2010)
|
|
Filing
141
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 140 Stipulation, filed by Richard Melton, Garth Bender, City of Napa. Signed by Judge Laporte on 12/8/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2010)
|
|
Filing
139
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 138 Stipulation, filed by Richard Melton, Garth Bender, City of Napa. Trial set for 4/18/2011 08:30 AM, Motion Hearing set for 1/25/2011 09:00 AM, Pretrial Conference set for 3/29/2011 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Laporte on 12/6/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2010)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER by Judge Laporte granting in part and denying in part 111 Motion for Summary Judgment (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2010)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER REGARDING IN CAMERA REVIEW OF COUNTY OF NAPA'S DOCUMENTS. Signed by Judge Laporte on 7/29/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2010)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER re 109 Stipulation filed by Richard Melton, Garth Bender, City of Napa, John Hallman, Luz Hernandez. Signed by Judge Laporte on 7/26/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2010)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER by Judge Laporte temporarily denying 72 Motion for Discovery; deferring ruling on 78 Motion to Bifurcate; Denying request to stay all Monell-related Discovery (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2010)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER REGARDING IN CAMERA REVIEW. Signed by Judge Laporte on 7/6/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2010)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER by Judge Laporte granting in part and denying in part 69 Motion for Discovery (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2010)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER by Judge Laporte granting in part and denying in part 63 Motion for In Camera Review of Law Enforcement Records (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2010)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER re 84 Stipulation, filed by Richard Melton, Garth Bender, City of Napa. Signed by Judge Laporte on 6/3/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2010)
|
|
Filing
61
STIPULATION & ORDER Continuing The Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) Deadline re 60 Stipulation. Signed by Mag. Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/23/2010. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2010)
|
|
Filing
56
STIPULATION & ORDER Signed by Mag. Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 2/9/2010 Continuing The Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) Deadline to 4/1/2010 re 55 Stipulation. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR DEFENDANT CHIEF OF POLICE RICHARD MELTON TO BE EXCUSED FROM ATTENDING EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION ("ENE") SESSION. Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker on 1/6/2010. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2010)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Dismiss (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2009)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING Initial Case Management Conference to 11/17/2009 10:00 AM. Rule 26(f) Reports, Initial Disclosures and Joint Case Management Conference Statement due 11/10/2009. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 9/14/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
