Belcan Engineers v. Karwash
| Belcan Engineers |
| Mohammed Karwash |
| 3:2009cv02891 |
| June 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Mateo |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| Plaintiff |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER RE: STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER SCHEDULE. Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered, with the exception that the pretrial conference is continued to January 21, 2014 and the trial is continued to February 3, 2014. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 6, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2012)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER SCHEDULE. Pursuant to stipulation, the amendments are so ordered, with the exception that the meet and confer date is extended from September 17, 2012 to December 17, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 27, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2012)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND MEDIATION DEADLINE. The mediation deadline is extended to February 28, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 9, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2012)
|
|
Filing
81
PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 10/14/2011. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2011)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SERVE DEFENDANT HASSAN C. IBRAHIM BY PUBLICATION; VACATING SEPTEMBER 16, 2011 HEARING. To the extent the Motion seeks leave to use publication as the method of service, said Motio n is denied as moot. To the extent the Motion seeks an extension of time to serve Ibrahim, said Motion is granted in part, and the time for service of said defendant is extended to August 19, 2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 13, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2011)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 2, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER by Judge Laporte granting 31 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2010)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER re 27 Stipulation filed by Belcan Engineers. Signed by Judge Laporte on 3/31/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Belcan Engineers v. Karwash | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Belcan Engineers | |
| Represented By: | Frederick James Northrop |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mohammed Karwash | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
