Brian Woods et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
Brian Woods, Kain Macy and Emily Molstad |
JP Morgan Chase & Co., Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. and Does |
Michael E Moore and Diane M Rooney |
3:2009cv03037 |
July 7, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Maxine M. Chesney |
Plaintiff |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO ALL COMPLAINTS AND RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The August 21, 2009 case management conferences scheduled in the four actions commenced in this district are adjourned. A case management c onference for MDL #2032 is scheduled for July 31, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. The deadline to file a consolidated amended complaint is July 24, 2009. The deadline to file a motion to compel arbitration is August 31, 2009; any other response to any complaint shall be filed no later than September 21, 2009. No later than July 24, 2009, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement. Defendants shall give notice of this order to all parties in the proposed tag-along cases, and shall file proof of such service no later than July 23, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 10, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.