Schlimmer v. General Electric Company et al
| Edward Schlimmer |
| General Electric Company, Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., Foster Wheeler LLC and General Dynamics Corporation |
| 4:2009cv03221 |
| July 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Solano |
| Phyllis J. Hamilton |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/11/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2014)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/10/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2014)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER re: government contractor defense. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/3/2014. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2014)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER re 34 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by General Dynamics Corporation, Attorney Edward R. Hugo for General Dynamics Corporation added. Attorney Mila F. Logvin; Daniel Dennis O'Shea; Keri Avellini Donohue and Gabriel Anne Jackson terminated.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/23/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2013)
|
|
Filing
29
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER from Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Signed by the MDL Panel on 8/21/2013. (vlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
