Cline v. Ameriprise Financial et al
Gail E. Cline |
Ameriprise Financial, Ameriprise Financial, Incorporated, Riversource Life Insurance Company, IDS Life Insurance Company, American Partners Life Insurance Company, American Enterprise Life Insurance Company, Timothy V. Bechtold, David Enemark and Michele Moore |
3:2009cv03480 |
July 28, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Mateo |
Bernard Zimmerman |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER to vacate 1/29/2010 Order of Dismissal without prejudice and enter ORDER of DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re 24 Stipulation, filed by RiverSource Life Insurance Company, Ameriprise Financial, Incorporated, Gail E. Cline. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/22/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2010) |
Filing 22 ORDER DISMISSING CASE (30 days conditional dismissal). Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/29/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2010) |
Filing 20 ORDER continuing mediation deadline to 2/26/2010 and CMC re 19 Stipulation filed by RiverSource Life Insurance Company, Ameriprise Financial, Incorporated Further Case Management Conference set for 2/26/2010 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/7/10. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.