Steadfast Insurance Company v. Probuilders Special Insurance Company et al
Steadfast Insurance Company |
Probuilders Special Insurance Company and American Safety Indemnity Company |
3:2009cv04098 |
September 3, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Los Angeles |
Samuel Conti |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 10/28/10. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2010) |
Filing 27 ORDER: The parties request to continue the trial date is DENIED. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 9/14/10. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2010) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending the deadline to complete early neutral evaluation to May 20, 2010. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 4/20/10. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2010) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER that the last date to complete the mediation pursuant to the ENE is extended to April 16, 2010.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 2/19/10. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2010) |
Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti denying 5 Motion to Remand (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2010) |
Filing 12 FIRST ORDER Re: MOTION TO REMAND. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 1/5/10. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.