Mariolle v. Volvo Group North America, Inc. et al
| Regina Lynn Mariolle |
| Volvo Group North America, Inc., Amsted Industires Incorporated and Consolidated Metco, Inc. |
| 3:2009cv04250 |
| September 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Bernard Zimmerman |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL. Federal Signal Corporation and Labrie Environmental Group are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 2, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO LODGE CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Defendant Volvo is directed to submit a chambers copy of its March 21, 2011 answer. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 3/30/2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2011)
|
|
Filing
63
CONDITIONAL ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT. Conditionally granting 61 Motion For Leave to File Third Amended Complaint; plaintiff is required to E-FILE the Third Amended Complaint by March 7, and serve the Third Amended Complaint by April 18, 2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2011).
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER RE. STIPULATION RE SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR WITTKE WASTE EQUIPMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/9/2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2010)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR LABRIE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 10, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Plaintiff shall file her second amended complaint no later than May 21, 2010 and serve it on the newly-named defendants no later than June 18, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 20, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2010)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR FILING AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO SET TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING. The First Amended Complaint attached to the parties' stipulation and previously filed by plaintiff on January 22, 2010 is deemed properly filed, and defendants will have 14 days from the date of this order to file a responsive pleading to plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 2, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2010)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO ADOPT PRE-TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER OF RELATED CASE NO. 9-1209 MMC AND REMOVE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM CALENDAR. The Case Management Conference set for January 29, 2010 is vacated. The applicable dates and orders set forth in the Pretrial Preparation Order of October 9, 2009 for Case No. C-09-1209 apply to Case No. 09-4250 MMC. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 20, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2010)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation to Continue Hearing Date. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on December 21, 2009. (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2009)
|
|
Filing
19
SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/15/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
