Bilodeau v. Viegas et al
| Alain Bilodeau and Erik Semelis |
| Victor A. Viegas, Clent Richardson, Stephen Ambler and Immersion Corporation |
| Nancy Mello |
| 3:2009cv04291 |
| September 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Securities & Exchange Commission Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. (mmclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2013)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE STATUS REPORT. Plaintiffs shall file with this Court, no later than January 18, 2012, a Status Report apprising the Court with respect to how they intend to proceed in the instant action. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November, 1 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2012)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Plaintiffs are ordered to show in writing and no later than October 31, 2012, why the instant action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 16, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2012)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER CLOSING CONSOLIDATED CASES FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES ONLY. Semelis v. Richardson, Case No. 09-4599 MMC, and Mello v Richardson, Case No. 09-5137 MMC, are closed for statistical purposes only. Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of any action, and, should further proceedings therein become necessary or desirable in either Case No. 09-4599 MMC or Case No. 09-5137 MMC, any party may initiate them in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 3, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2010)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT AND RESPONSES THERETO. Plaintiffs shall file a Consolidated Derivative Complaint no later than 90 days after the anticipated restatement is filed with the SEC but in no event late r than July 30, 2010. The deadline for defendants to move, answer or otherwise respond shall be 60 days after the Consolidated Derivative Complaint is filed. In the event defendants move to dismiss, plaintiffs shall filed their opposition no later than 60 days after such motion is filed, and defendants shall file any reply no later than 40 days after such opposition is filed. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 21, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2010)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY ROBERT I. HARWOOD PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 8, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2009)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION CONSOLIDATING ACTIONS AND APPOINTING CO-LEAD COUNSEL. The following actions are consolidated: 9-4291 MMC, Bilodeau v. Viegas; 9-4599 MMC, Semelis v. Richardson; and 9-5137 MMC, Mello v. Richardson. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 17, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
