Burnham Brown A Professional Law Corporation v. Kunkel et al
| Burnham Brown A Professional Law Corporation |
| Donald Kunkel, Advanced Recycling Equipment, Inc and Bio Mass Energy Concepts, LLC |
| 3:2009cv04811 |
| October 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 24, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2010)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER CONDITIONALLY CLOSING CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 17, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2010)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER RE: INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF. The Case Management Conference is continued from January 15, 2010 to February 26, 2010. Further, plaintiff is directed to file, no later than February 5, 2010, (1) a request for e ntry of default as to any defendant who by that date has not filed a response to the complaint, or, in the alternative, (2) a statement indicating why plaintiff should not be required to make such request. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 7, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
