Castro v. Horel et al
Carlos Castro |
Robert A. Horel, D. Mount, S. Beeson, S. McKinney, N. Grannis, Everett W. Fisher, L. Speen and M. Duff |
3:2009cv04902 |
October 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Del Norte |
Edward M. Chen |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATED DISMISSAL by Hon. William Alsup granting 46 Motion for Extension of Time to File.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011) |
Filing 42 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case Management Conference set for 7/21/2011 03:00 PM. Signed by Judge Alsup on May 23, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2011) |
Filing 38 ORDER STAYING CASE Case Management Conference set for 5/26/2011 03:00 PM. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 28, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2011) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 5/11/2010. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2010) |
Filing 18 ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT AND VACATING HEARING [re 11 Notice (Other), Notice (Other) filed by D. Mount, N. Grannis, S. Beeson, Robert A. Horel, Everett W. Fisher, S. McKinney]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 4/13/2010. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.