Blinglet, Inc. v. Amber Alert Safety Center, Inc. et al
| Blinglet, Inc. |
| Amber Alert Safety Center, Inc. and Kai D. Patterson |
| 3:2009cv05156 |
| October 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Susan Illston |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice upon settlement. Within 90 days from the date hereof, taht settlement has not in fact occurred, the foregoing order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2010)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER continuing motion to 10/12/10 @ 9 a.m. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2010)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER continuing motion to 9/17/10 at 9 a.m. and cmc to 10/26/10 @ 3 p.m. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2010)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY LETTER (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2010)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting substitution (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2010)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER. Signed by Judge Laporte on 4/7/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2010)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying motion to dismiss [Docket No. 3](SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2010)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Motion Hearing set for 2/5/2010 09:00 AM. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
