Skaff v. Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. et al
| Richard Skaff |
| Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. and General Growth Properties, Inc. |
| 3:2009cv05518 |
| November 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Marin |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER GRANTING 71 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AGAINST DEFENDANT REAL MEX RESTAURANTS, INC.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 5/10/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2013)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER LIFTING STAY. Case Management Statement due by 5/17/2013. Case Management Conference set for 5/24/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/8/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER GRANTING 67 STIPULATION for Dismissal Against General Growth Properties, Inc. Only. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/8/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER GRANTING 65 STIPULATION: Third Joint Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 5/3/2013. Case Management Conference set for 5/10/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/21/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2013)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 60 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 2/1/2013. Case Management Conference set for 2/8/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/26/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2012)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER GRANTING 58 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 1/11/2013. Case Management Conference set for 1/18/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/15/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2012)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER GRANTING 54 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 10/19/2012. Case Management Conference set for 10/26/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/12/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2012)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER DIRECTING GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES TO FILE A MOTION TO STAY. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 11/7/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2011)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 11/4/2011.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/24/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER GRANTING 29 Stipulation FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF THE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ASPECT OF THE LAWSUIT AGAINST GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC. ONLY. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/15/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2011)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 08/06/10. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2010)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING 16 Stipulation Enlargement of Time to Meet and Confer. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/1/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2010)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING 12 Stipulation FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/1/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
