Protech Group Asia, Limited v. Network Scrap Metal Corporation et al
Protech Group Asia, Limited |
Network Scrap Metal Corporation, Samuel W. Miller, Forestille Holdings, LLC, Jay Hansen, Norm Hatch, Static Services Corporation, Cheryl Ann Archibald, Veronica Coudreau, Micheal S. Hlodu, Glomax Resource Group and Edmond Yu |
3:2009cv05597 |
November 25, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Maxine M. Chesney |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: The instant action is hereby DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), without prejudice to PGAs refiling the action in an appropriate district or other forum. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2010) |
Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 21, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2010) |
Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED OR TRANSFERRED FOR IMPROPER VENUE. PGA is ordered to show cause, no later than January 15, 2010, and in writing not to exceed five pages in length, why the instant action should not be dismissed without prejudice based on improper venue, or, in the alternative, transferred to the Middle District of FloridaSigned by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 29, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.