Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company v. White et al
| Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company |
| Geoffrey V. White, Law Office of Geoffrey V. White and Lorraine M Burke |
| 3:2009cv05668 |
| December 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| None |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER GOVERNING REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/25/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2011)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion for Summary Judgment (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2010)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER BRIEFING AND CONTINUING HEARING. Motion Hearing set for 7/2/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 4/21/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2010)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/11/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2010)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER Granting 29 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on March 10, 2010. (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White denying 17 Motion to Deposit Funds (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
