Corby v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
| Janette Corby |
| UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, Wink Communications, Inc. and Wink Communications, Inc., Long Term Disability Plan |
| 3:2009cv05890 |
| December 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| William H. Alsup |
| None |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Alsup granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2010)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 17, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2010)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 16, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2010)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER DENYING VACATION OF MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 10, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' JOINT MOTION TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 8, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2010)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER DENYING MODIFICATION OF CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 21, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
