Gunn v. Starbucks Corporation
Sean Gunn |
Starbucks Corporation |
3:2009cv05981 |
December 22, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Mendocino |
Bernard Zimmerman |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on April 18, 2011. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2011) |
Filing 67 ORDER GRANTING 66 Stipulation to Dismiss With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on April 15, 2011. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2011) |
Filing 65 ORDER VACATING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES AND TERMINATING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/18/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011) |
Filing 63 ORDER VACATING HEARING re 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment or In the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Starbucks Corporation. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/22/11. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2011) |
Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING 30 Stipulation to Extend Discovery and Expert and Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadlines. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/3/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2011) |
Filing 29 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/1/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2010) Modified on 9/1/2010 (jjoS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 27 ORDER DENYING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jefffrey S. White on 7/20/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2010) |
Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING 24 Stipulation to Continue Deadline to Hold Alternate Dispute Resolution Session. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/28/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2010) |
Filing 23 ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/21/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2010) |
Filing 19 ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/13/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2010) |
Filing 18 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/12/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2010) |
Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING 14 Stipulation to Continue Deadline to Exchange Initial Disclosures. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/5/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2010) |
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING 11 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/29/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gunn v. Starbucks Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sean Gunn | |
Represented By: | Richard James Meechan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation | |
Represented By: | Jonmi Nai On Koo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.