Test01 v. Test02 SHORT TITLE
Plaintiff: TESTghoehjgejrjpojgepjg
Defendant: TESTiue4wugvirewuewr98
Case Number: 3:2009cv09999
Filed: May 22, 1990
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Louis C. Bechtle
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 835 ORDER re 98 Letter Have a great time here!. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/2/2019. (ecgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2019)
September 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 833 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting 831 Motion to Dismiss. (ecgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2019)
August 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 828 ORDER by Judge Vince Chhabria granting 825 Ex Parte Application. (ecgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2019)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 826 ORDER by Judge Vince Chhabria granting 818 Motion to Dismiss. (ecgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2019)
September 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 578 ORDER by Judge James Ware granting 577 Motion to Dismiss Case Management Conference set for 9/29/2017 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. This is a text only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry. (ecgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2017)
January 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 473 TEST ORDER. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 01/29/2015. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2015)
February 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 376 ORDER by Judge Jon S. Tigar denying 375 Motion to Quash (ewn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2013)
April 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 331 STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time to file an answer. Signed by Judge Charles A. Legge on 04/23/2012. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2012)
February 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 296 Order by Judge Wm. Fremming Nielsen denying 295 Motion to Dismiss; granting 295 Motion to Compel; denying 295 Motion to Alter Judgment.(ewn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2012)
March 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 248 ORDER by Judge Nielsen granting 247 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (ewn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2011)
February 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 206 ORDER by Executive Committee denying 205 Motion to Appear by Telephone; striking 205 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting in part and denying in part 205 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. (rcs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2011)
August 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 170 ORDER testing Metadata. Signed by Judge Nielsen on 8/12/10. (ewn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2010) (Main Document 170 replaced on 8/12/2010) (ewn, COURT STAFF).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Test01 v. Test02 SHORT TITLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TESTghoehjgejrjpojgepjg
Represented By: Erik Nielsen, ESQ.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TESTiue4wugvirewuewr98
Represented By: Bud Feria
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?