In the Matter of Robert A. Tayac
Respondent: Robert A. Tayac
Case Number: 3:2009mc80041
Filed: March 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER placing Robert A. Tayac back on the roll of attorneys authorized to practice before this court re 2 MOTION Petition for Reinstatement re 1 Order, filed by Robert A. Tayac. Signed by Judge Vaughn R. Walker on 5/4/2009. (gsa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2009)
March 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER removing Robert A. Tayac from the roll of attorneys authorized to practice before this court until such time as he provides proof that he has been reinstated to active status by the State Bar of California. Signed by Judge Vaughn R. Walker on 3/6/2009. (gsa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In the Matter of Robert A. Tayac
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert A. Tayac
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?