Precision Concrete Cutting, Inc. v. Rifley et al
| Precision Concrete Cutting, Inc. |
| Bryan Patrick Rifley, Bryan Patrick Rifley, Jr. and Channel Islands Sawing |
| 3:2010cv00310 |
| January 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Ventura |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/15/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2011)
|
|
Filing
61
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 60 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR A THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT PER LOCAL PATENT RULE 4-3.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/17/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2010)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER ON PARTIES' STIPULATED REQUEST FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT PER LOCAL PATENT RULE 4-3. signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/22/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2010)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT PER LOCAL PATENT RULE 4-3. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/1/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010)
|
|
Filing
55
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 50 . Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 10/26/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 10/31/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
