Haynes v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
Nathaniel Haynes |
EMC Mortgage Corporation, Bears Stearns and Quality Loan Service Corporation |
3:2010cv00372 |
January 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
William H. Alsup |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT by Judge William Alsup [denying 10 Motion to Dismiss; denying 13 Motion to Dismiss; granting 27 Motion to Remand]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2010) |
Filing 40 ORDER CLARIFYING HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO REMAND. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 24, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2010) |
Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE by Judge Alsup granting 24 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2010) |
Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE by Judge Alsup granting 23 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2010) |
Filing 22 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 21 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 1/20/08. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.