The McGraw Company et al v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.
The McGraw Company and Western Service Contract Corp |
Harley-Davidson, Inc. and H-D Michigan, LLC |
3:2010cv00539 |
February 5, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Mateo |
Jeffrey S. White |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER GRANTING 36 Stipulation OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/9/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2011) |
Filing 35 ORDER GRANTING 34 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on March 24, 2011. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2011) |
Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING 32 Stipulation to Continue Dates. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on January 28, 2011. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2011) |
Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING 30 Stipulation to Extend Fact and Expert Discovery Cut-Off. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on October 15, 2010. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2010) |
Filing 29 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 8/23/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2010) |
Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING 21 Stipulation to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/23/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2010) |
Filing 20 ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/21/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.