Rupert et al v. Jones et al
| William Rupert and Carol Slater |
| Barbara J.R. Jones, Richard J Henderson, Yvonne Busch, Rick Ward, Anthony Carver, Jean Hutchins, Maria Dunn, County of Mendocino, Mendocino County Board of Supervisors, Mendocino County Sheriff's Office and Ronald M. George |
| 3:2010cv00721 |
| February 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Cruz |
| Vaughn R. Walker |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
JUDGMENT: Defendants' motions to dismiss for summary judgment having been granted, judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2011) Modified on 3/10/2011 (ys, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER GRANTING COUNTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2011)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER Case Management Conference set for 2/11/2011 02:30 PM. Motion Hearing set for 2/11/2011 09:00 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2011)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2010)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER Directing Clerk to Transfer Action to San Francisco or Oakland Division. Signed by Judge Whyte on 7/13/10. (rmwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
