Vertkin, M.D. v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
| Anna Vertkin, M.D. |
| Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, First American Loanstar Trustee and Frank Howard Allen Realtors |
| 3:2010cv00775 |
| February 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/18/11. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2011)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE JANUARY 6, 2011 CALENDAR. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/5/2011. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2011)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER RE: 9 GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 09/09/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2010)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER RE: 30 , 34 DENYING MOTION TO DISQUALIFY AND GRANTING REQUEST TO CONTINUE MOTION HEARING. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 06/30/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2010)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER RE: 1 , 4 , 6 (IN C 10-1359 RS) CONTINUING MOTION HEARING IN 4 , 6 TO 06/17/2010 AT 1:30 PM AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR ALL PENDING MOTIONS IN C 10-1359 RS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 04/21/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
