Johnson et al v. County of Alameda et al
| Cynthia Johnson and Jamont Johnson |
| County of Alameda, Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Alameda County Sheriff's Office Detention and Correction Division and Keith Gilkerson |
| 3:2010cv01437 |
| April 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FURTHER CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND HEARING TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 12/8/2011 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/14/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2011)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FURTHER CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND HEARING TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/17/2011 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/11/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2011)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND HEARING TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing Rescheduled for 10/20/2011 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/8/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2011)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Case Management Conference set for 8/4/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/1/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011)
|
|
Filing
62
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/14/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2011)
|
|
Filing
44
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/6/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2011)
|
|
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY AND TO HEAR PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/28/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2011)
|
|
Filing
31
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 29 CONTINUING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY AND TO HEAR MOTIONS TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/10/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2011)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE MEDIATION re 25 Stipulation filed by Cynthia Johnson, Jamont Johnson. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/22/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2010)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER RE: 12 REASSIGNING CASE TO JUDGE SEEBORG. Case Management Conference set for 7/22/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/21/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2010)
|
|
Filing
6
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 5 Stipulation to extend time to answer filed by Alameda County Sheriff's Office Detention and Correction Division, County of Alameda, Alameda County Sheriff's Office. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/10/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
4
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 3 Stipulation filed by Alameda County Sheriff's Office Detention and Correction Division, County of Alameda, Alameda County Sheriff's Office. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/27/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
