Goldman v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
| Charles G. Goldman |
| Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. |
| 3:2010cv01470 |
| April 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER RE: NOTICE OF EXECUTION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued to December 10, 2010. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than December 3, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 5, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2010)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER RE: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST TO VACATE ALL DEADLINES. The parties' joint request to vacate all current deadlines is granted, with the exception that the Case Management Conference is not vacated, but is continued from October 8, 2010 to November 12, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 27, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND TO STRIKE; VACATING HEARING. To the extent the motion seeks dismissal of plaintiff's claim that defendant terminated plaintiff in violation of 29 U.S.C. sec. 1140, the motion is granted. To the extent the motion seeks dismissal of plaintiff's claim that defendant is subject to statutory penalties pursuant to 29 U.S.C. sec. 1132(c)(1), the motion is denied. To the extent the motion seeks an order striking paragraphs 42 and 43, the motion is granted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 3, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2010)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued from August 6, 2010 to October 8, 2010. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than October 1, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 30, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2010)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND TO STRIKE AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The hearing on defendant's motion is continued from July 9, 2010 to July 16, 2010. The Case Management Conference is continued from July 16, 2010 to August 6, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 1, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Goldman v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles G. Goldman | |
| Represented By: | Russell Leibson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
