Griffin v. Willow Pass One, LLC. et al
Irving Griffin |
Willow Pass One, LLC., JLD-WP, LLC, California Check Cashing, LLC and California Check Cashing, Inc. |
3:2010cv01867 |
April 30, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Contra Costa |
Maria-Elena James |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/1/2011. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2011) |
Filing 33 CONSENT DECREE & ORDER AS TO INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ONLY re 32 Proposed Order filed by Irving Griffin. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/8/2011. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2011) |
Filing 19 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND re 17 Stipulation filed by JLD-WP, LLC, California Check Cashing, Inc., California Check Cashing, LLC. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 7/9/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2010) |
Filing 16 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND re 14 Stipulation filed by JLD-WP, LLC, California Check Cashing, Inc., California Check Cashing, LLC. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/22/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2010) |
Filing 12 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/16/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.