Warren v. Paychex, Inc.
Danielle Warren |
Paychex, Inc. |
3:2010cv02006 |
May 10, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Mateo |
Joseph C. Spero |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ORDER GRANTING re 63 Notice/Request to Appear Telephonically at Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs filed by Paychex, Inc.. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/21/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2011) |
Filing 54 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING NOTICE DISTRIBUTION AND RELATED DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/19/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2011) |
Filing 45 ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT FROM JUNE 10, 2011 TO JUNE 17, 2011 re 44 Stipulation to File Amended Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement filed by Paychex, Inc. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/10/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2011) |
Filing 33 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM 4/8/11 TO 4/22/11. Further Case Management Conference re-set for 4/22/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/7/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2011) |
Filing 29 ORDER GRANTING re 27 Request to Appear Telephonically at Case Management Conference filed by Paychex, Inc. Counsel shall be on phone standby beginning at 1:30 PM and await the Court's call. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/28/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2011) |
Filing 26 ORDER GRANTING re 25 Stipulation to Continuing Case Management Conference from January 21, 2011 to March 4, 2011, filed by Paychex, Inc. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/4/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/24/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2011) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION AND ORDER PERMITTING DISCLOSURE OF CONTACT INFORMATION OF PUTATIVE CLASS MEMBERS. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/22/10. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2010) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: CONTINUATION OF MEDIATION, CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AND CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION. Mediation deadline continued to 1/12/11. Further Case Management Conference re-set for 1/21/2011 at 01:30 PM. Updated Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/14/2011. Motion For Class Cert. due by 5/6/2011. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 09/21/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2010) Modified on 9/22/2010 (klh, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Warren v. Paychex, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Danielle Warren | |
Represented By: | David Adam Lowe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Paychex, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.