Kennard Watkins v. Ben Curry et al
Kennard Watkins |
Ben Curry, Amy, J. Summers and Does |
3:2010cv02539 |
June 10, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Susan Illston |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 fp |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 JUDGMENT (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011) |
Filing 20 ORDER PERMITTING DEPOSITION OF INCARCERATED PLAINTIFF AND EXTENDING DEADLINES re 18 , 19 . Defendant must file and serve her dispositive motion no later than 7/15/11. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion is due 8/19/11. Defendant must file and serve any reply brief no later than 9/9/11. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2011) Modified on 6/2/2011 (ys, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 13 ORDER OF SERVICE: The clerk shall issue a summons and the USM shall serve, without prepayment of fees, the summons, a copy of the amended complaint and a copy of all the documents in the case file upon Amy Dzioba, a mailroom supervisor at CTF - sole dad. Defendant's motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion is due 6/10/11. Plaitniff's opposition is due 7/15/11. Defendant's optional reply brief is due 7/29/11. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2011: # 1 Envelope) (tf, COURT STAFF). Modified on 3/22/2011 (ys, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 10 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.