Hamed v. Macy's West Stores, Inc.
Shokat Hamed |
Macy's West Stores, Inc. |
3:2010cv02790 |
June 25, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Joseph C. Spero |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 205 ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero Granting in Part and Denying in Part 184 Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2011) |
Filing 204 Amended Order Denying Macy's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on October 25, 2011. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011) |
Filing 202 ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero Denying 181 Macy's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2011) |
Filing 177 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS MOTION. Motion to be filed by 8/24/2011. Responses/Opposition due by 9/9/2011. Replies due by 9/16/2011. Motion Hearing set for 10/7/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/4/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2011) |
Filing 126 ORDER DIRECTING THAT THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FURNISH DAILY REFRESHMENTS. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/14/2011. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2011) |
Filing 84 Second Amended Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on May 20, 2011. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2011) |
Filing 82 Amended Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Joseph C. Spero (terminating 77 Motion for Hearing (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2011) |
Filing 73 ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero Granting in Part and Denying in Part 48 Motion for Summary Judgment (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2011) |
Filing 36 ORDER GRANTING re 35 Letter filed by Macy's West Stores, Inc. for Ms. Nelson to appear by phone at the CMC on 2/4/11 at 1:30 PM. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/1/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2011) |
Filing 30 ORDER GRANTING re 29 Letter filed by Macy's West Stores, Inc., for JoAnn Nelson to appear by phone on 12/3/10 at 1:30 PM for the further case mgmt conference. Court will initiate the phone contact. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/29/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hamed v. Macy's West Stores, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shokat Hamed | |
Represented By: | Henry G Wykowski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Macy's West Stores, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Susan Tayeko Kumagai |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.