Lupe et al v. Bilyeu et al
| John Lupe, Multiband Corporation, Multiband SC Incorporated and Multiband NE Incorporated |
| Woody D. Bilyeu, Mary H. Bilyeu and Patrick Brian Shelton |
| 3:2010cv03114 |
| July 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER GRANTING 55 Stipulation for Waiver of Oral Argument on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or to Transfer Based on Improper Venue. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/5/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2011)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING 28 Stipulation RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/18/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2010)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/13/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2010)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 14 Stipulation filed by Woody D. Bilyeu, Mary H. Bilyeu. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/3/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2010)
|
|
Filing
8
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 7 Stipulation filed by Woody D. Bilyeu, Patrick Brian Shelton, Mary H. Bilyeu. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/12/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
