Serrano v. Indymac Federal Bank, FSB et al
Evelio Serrano |
Indymac Federal Bank, FSB, Quality Loan Service Corporation and Miawand Bayan |
3:2010cv03522 |
August 11, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER LIFTING STAY, DISMISSING DEFENDANTS INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB AND FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER, AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Case Management Statement due by 4/8/2011. Case Management Conference set for 4/15/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/18/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011) |
Filing 14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY STAY SHOULD NOT BE LIFTED. Show Cause Response due by 3/11/2011. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/28/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2011) |
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING 9 MOTION to Substitute Party FDIC as Receiver for Indymac Federal Bank, FSB and Request for Stay. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/18/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2010) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON "SUBSTITUTION OF FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB AND REQUEST FOR STAY". Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/28/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.