Hamilton v. Shoopman et al
Bernard Lee Hamilton |
Colleen Shoopman, T. Pinkston, J. Van Blarcom, J. Arnold, D. Coleman, R. Turner, R. K. Wong, D. Van Leer and D. K. Henunury |
3:2010cv03682 |
August 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Marin |
Susan Illston |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 30 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/3/2013) |
Filing 29 JUDGMENT (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/9/2013) |
Filing 25 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A STAY 24 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/2/2012) |
Filing 23 ORDER re 19 22 22 . Granting 10 Plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendants Pinkston and Coleman. Denying 22 Plaintiff's request for entry of default and for entry of default judgment against the remaining three defendants. No lat er than August 10, 2012, plaintiff must (a) file a proof of service showing that he has caused the summons and amended complaint to be served on each defendant or (b) show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to serve process within 120 days of the filing of the complaint.(Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/28/2012) Modified on 6/29/2012 (ysS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 21 USCA ORDER (11-72230) : No further filings shall be accepted in this closed case. DENIED. (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2011) |
Filing 15 ORDER (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.