Frayer v. County of Alameda et al
Plaintiff: Aaron Frayer
Defendant: County of Alameda, Katherine More, Thomas Nolan, City Of Oakland, James Moore and D. Ming
Case Number: 3:2010cv04095
Filed: September 13, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/6/2012. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012)
October 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 64 Ex Parte Application for leave to file late; denying 65 Ex Parte motion to strike. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2012)
July 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER re 54 Amended MOTION to Continue filed by Aaron Frayer. Reset Deadlines as to 52 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, 50 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . Responses due by 8/10/2012. Replies due by 8/24/2012. Motion Hearing reset for 9/28/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/16/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2012)
March 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 43 Stipulation (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012)
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER re 40 Letter, filed by Katherine Moore, Thomas Nolan, County of Alameda. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 3/8/2012. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2012)
February 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Katherine More, etal. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/27/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Settlement Conference set for 4/12/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Judge Zimmerman. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/9/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2012)
October 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER further continuing Settlement Conference and CMC re 33 Stipulation filed by Katherine More, Thomas Nolan, County of Alameda. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/18/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)
July 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER Vacating Settlement Conference and CMC re 31 Stipulation filed by County of Alameda. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/15/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2011)
May 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER to continue Settlement Conference and CMC re 27 Stipulation filed by Katherine More, Thomas Nolan, County of Alameda Further Case Management Conference set for 8/19/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/4/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2011)
April 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER to continue CMC re 25 Stipulation filed by Katherine More, Thomas Nolan, County of Alameda Further Case Management Conference set for 5/27/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/20/2011. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frayer v. County of Alameda et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron Frayer
Represented By: David J. Beauvais
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Alameda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Katherine More
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Nolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City Of Oakland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Ming
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?