Paulick v. Ritz-Carlton, Half Moon Bay et al
Michael Paulick |
Ritz-Carlton, Half Moon Bay, Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC, SHC Half Moon Bay, LLC, DTRS Half Moon Bay, LLC, Marriott International, Inc. and Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. |
3:2010cv04107 |
September 13, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Contra Costa |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 ORDER of DISMISSAL (30 days conditional dismissal). Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/31/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2013) |
Filing 70 ORDER granting 69 STIPULATION re Reset Hearings, 68 Order on Stipulation Notice of Settlement. Case Management Statement due by 12/6/2013. Further Case Management Conference reset for 12/13/2013 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/28/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2013) |
Filing 60 ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/15/2013. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2013) |
Filing 23 ORDER re 22 Stipulation, filed by SHC Half Moon Bay, LLC, Marriott International, Inc., Ritz-Carlton, Half Moon Bay, Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC, Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc., DTRS Half Moon Bay, LLC. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/1/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.