Britton v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Charlene A. Britton |
Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products, Inc. |
3:2010cv04450 |
October 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Thelton E. Henderson |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER by The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, MDL No. 2210 & Case No. 0-11-md-02210-WPD.(Attachments: #(1) Transmittal Letter) (tnS,) (Filed on 2/24/2011) |
Filing 24 ORDER of Voluntary Dismissal of Charlene A. Britton. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/03/2011. Charlene A. Britton terminated. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2011) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER Selecting ADR Process, Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 12/22/10. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2010) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting stay of proceedings pending decision by the Judicial panel on MDL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 12/21/10. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2010) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 11/3/10. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.