Best Buy Co., Inc. et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Purchasing LLC, Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P., Best Buy China Ltd. and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. |
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics, USA, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Hannstar Display Corp., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Philips Electronics North America Corp., Seiko Epson Corporation, Sharp Corp., Sharp Electronics Corp. and Tatung Company of America, Inc. |
3:2010cv04572 |
October 8, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Bernard Zimmerman |
Antitrust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.