Harris et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Ruthellen Harris, Heather Harris, Jamie Harris and Greg Harris |
Costco Wholesale Corporation, Warehouse Demo Services, Inc., Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation and Fresh Choice International, LLC |
4:2010cv04626 |
October 13, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Donna M. Ryu |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 144 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME re 143 Letter filed by Ruthellen Harris. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on November 30, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2012) |
Filing 142 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME re 141 Letter filed by Ruthellen Harris. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on October 31, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2012) |
Filing 140 ORDER RE: PROPOSED JUDGMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/2/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012) Modified on 10/2/2012 (ahm, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 139 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/1/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2012) |
Filing 136 PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/25/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2012) |
Filing 134 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE CORLEY UPON CONSENT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/24/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2012) |
Filing 131 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON 130 CONSENT AND SETTING CERTAIN CASE MANAGEMENT DATES. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/23/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2012) |
Filing 120 ORDER Granting Stipulated Request for Order Changing Time on Plaintiff's 119 Motion to Continue Trial. Reset Deadlines as to 119 MOTION to Continue Trial. Motion Hearing set for 5/17/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/14/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2012) |
Filing 105 ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING WDS' 88 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING COSTCO'S UNOPPOSED 90 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, and GRANTING COSTCO'S UNOPPOSED 91 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ITS CROSS COMPLAINT AS TO EXPRESS INDEMNITY. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2012) |
Filing 94 ORDER Granting 93 STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME. Responses due by 3/9/2012. Replies due by 3/16/2012. 88 , 90 , 91 Motion Hearing set for 4/5/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Case Management Statement due by 3/29/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/5/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/30/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2012) |
Filing 86 ORDER Granting 85 Stipulation to Continue Mediation and Discovery Deadlines. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/25/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011) |
Filing 80 ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING DEFENDANTS 75 MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2011) |
Filing 38 ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 8 MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2011) |
Filing 9 ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PENDING CONSENT TO JURISDICTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Previously noticed hearing date of 1/13/2011 re 8 MOTION to Dismiss Second Cause of Action has been VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 11/30/2010. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.