Benko et al v. Contra Costa Community College District
| Peter Benko and Daniel Cruz |
| Contra Costa Community College District |
| 3:2010cv04943 |
| November 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Joseph C. Spero |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/31/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER DENYING re 26 Stipulation Requesting Additional Time to Complete Mediation and Continuance of Case Management Conference filed by Peter Benko. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/2/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2011)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DOCUMENTS. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/27/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2011)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 02/07/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2011)
|
|
Filing
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING. Dft shall have until 1/28/11 to file a responsive pleading. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/24/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
