Doyle v. CT Corporation System et al
| Katherine Doyle |
| CT Corporation System, Wolters Kluwer and Accessdata Group |
| 3:2010cv05147 |
| November 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Sonoma |
| Charles R. Breyer |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/18/2012. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER regarding Fed.R.CIV.P 26(A)(3) Pretrial Disclosures re 35 First MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Accessdata Group. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/13/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS Against CT Corporation System and Wolters Kluwer U.S. INC., re 30 Stipulation filed by CT Corporation System, Wolters Kluwer, CT Corporation System and Wolters Kluwer terminated.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/12/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2011)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER setting pre-trial dates re 27 Stipulation filed by CT Corporation System, Wolters Kluwer Expert Discovery due by 12/30/2011. Expert Witness Disclosures due by 11/25/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 11/11/2011. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/28/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
