Rhynes et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
| Gloria Rhynes and Darrell Jenkins |
| Stryker Corporation and Stryker Orthopaedics |
| 3:2010cv05619 |
| December 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Samuel Conti |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 1/22/13. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013)
|
|
Filing
57
Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 56 Stipulation.(sclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2012)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 53 Ex Parte Application. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2012)
|
|
Filing
50
STIPULATION AND ORDER Status Conference set for 5/4/2012 is continued to 7/6/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 5/1/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting 29 Motion to Dismiss (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting 14 Motion to Dismiss (sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2011)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/1/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
